13-05-2024, 09:15 PM
The New Yorker has run an investigative piece on her guilt. I won’t link here obvs, but it’s an interesting read.
13-05-2024, 09:15 PM
The New Yorker has run an investigative piece on her guilt. I won’t link here obvs, but it’s an interesting read.
13-05-2024, 09:45 PM in response to #46459 13-05-2024, 09:59 PM in response to #46459 13-05-2024, 10:47 PM in response to #46465 Bullsgold Wrote: The link to the piece appears to be broken. 'The piece, written by staff writer Rachel Aviv, is available to US readers but is blocked on the UK version of the site for legal reasons. It is still available to British users of the New Yorker app and subscribers to the print magazine.' So Baldman just wanted to (virtue) signal that he has a subscription and we don't... 14-05-2024, 05:35 AM in response to #46464
And “listen” button.
Cheers Baldy. 14-05-2024, 05:40 AM in response to #46465
Just use https://12ft.io
It's an interesting read, I remember thinking some things about the case were odd at the time of the trial. 14-05-2024, 05:44 AM in response to #46467 DesCartes Wrote: 'The piece, written by staff writer Rachel Aviv, is available to US readers but is blocked on the UK version of the site for legal reasons. It is still available to British users of the New Yorker app and subscribers to the print magazine.' I don’t have a subscription to that lefty rag! 14-05-2024, 06:02 AM in response to #46459 Baldman Wrote: The New Yorker has run an investigative piece on her guilt. I won’t link here obvs, but it’s an interesting read. One always has to be wary of second guessing a jury who have sat through all the evidence, but I did do a little double take after reading about that verdict. Will have a gander at the article later. 14-05-2024, 06:58 AM in response to #46467 DesCartes Wrote: 'The piece, written by staff writer Rachel Aviv, is available to US readers but is blocked on the UK version of the site for legal reasons. It is still available to British users of the New Yorker app and subscribers to the print magazine.' It's more simple than that. As Tories get worse, Balders and Meerkat post more and more irrelevant stories. This thread is not about Lucy Letby guilt. It's about Baldman's embarrassment. 14-05-2024, 07:13 AM (This post was last modified: 14-05-2024, 07:13 AM by Kev-YCFC.) in response to #46471
If the blood insulin levels are high but there's no c-peptide it's injected insulin, to the best of my knowledge c--peptide levels are the means of clinical diagnosis for T1D, a higher blood sugar with c-peptide is the T2 indicator.
Cheers for the link fix Sicknote, an interesting read but insulin levels swing it for me, there is a 'thing' called 'reactive hypoglycaemia' which is a non diabetic low blood sugar which has food triggers and doesn't kill you, but injecting insulin if you don't need it will. |
|