09-04-2024, 08:37 PM in response to #40489
Marked Ox Wrote: No as the rule is for a rolling period therefore the charges are completely separate.
The charges are separate but cover an overlapping period. Being punished twice for the same instance (a particular years overspend) is fundamentally wrong so the penalty should be adjusted. If you want them punished more then make the tariff higher.
The way you want it a club could overspend one year through misjudgement and be punished three times for it. They should underspend to compensate but it’s not always that simple so the penalty shouldn’t be the same three times.