20-05-2024, 09:27 PM in response to #47458
Baldman Wrote: None of this works. Is it what people say in your group? It’s too nonsensical and (in a REAL surprise) relies on disingenuous misinterpretation of the opposing view.
Did you read the entire article GC was celebrating?
What am I misrepresenting? The case revolved around a biological female who didn't fit a certain stereotype of a woman and so apparently should have been forced to reveal personal information on the request of others. How is that not unnervingly dystopian?