08-05-2024, 12:54 PM in response to #45309
Leeds Sandgrounder Wrote: No it isn't, that's absolute bollocks. She isn't standing next time - what should Labour have done with this massive pre-election open goal, in your opinion?
Yesterday you were shaking your head at the green party for its new members. Today you accept someone into your party who supports the Rwanda bill and used Rashford's missed penalty to attack his work on getting hungry kids fed (she ended up apologising).
The only way your position is not contradictory is if the Labour Party and you now supports the Rwanda bill and you think Rashford was wrong to feed hungry kids. If not then the only bollocks thing is your overuse of the word to avoid criticism.
What should Labour have done? Let her clutter off to reform. Her natural home. Accepting her is both theatrical and pathetic in equal measure. There will be a cigarette paper between Tories and Labour come election time and its no use citing policies at me cos he'll ditch them anyway.